Super League Rugby Fans Forum
Knocking One Out - Printable Version

+- Super League Rugby Fans Forum (http://www.superleaguefans.com/forum)
+-- Forum: The Bench (/forum-40.html)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic Chat (/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Knocking One Out (/thread-463.html)



RE: Froch v Groves - MOT - 11-24-2013 10:42 AM

(11-24-2013 01:08 AM)mrphillyc of 606 fame! Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:05 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  Why ain't you ban him? You have this power, Philo.

Come on really... Would be like clubbing a baby seal. Let the dunce have his fun.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So why were posts deleted, our did SUID actually open up emotionally and then talk to himself?

Hope it's all good SUID, let it out.


RE: Froch v Groves - The Man With No Name - 11-24-2013 10:43 AM

(11-23-2013 11:32 PM)blazingmole Wrote:  Boxing is fixed.

I don't usually throw accusations of this nature but you would forgive me for thinking the same.

It was a terrible decision to stop that fight. Groves was up by at least 3 and had a knock down to his credit.

The ref needs jailing for robbing people of the full 12 rounds... and a Groves win.


RE: Froch v Groves - MOT - 11-24-2013 10:44 AM

(11-24-2013 01:26 AM)sinkers89 Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:25 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:22 AM)mrphillyc of 606 fame! Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:05 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  Why ain't you ban him? You have this power, Philo.

I do indeed. I like to watch people make a complete proper tom tit fool of themselves for all to see before wielding the axe. Desperate substance from a desperate man if truth be told in his instance...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You're saying that the threat of your banning him made him call you a "blathering pole-fancy", or words to that effect?

(11-24-2013 01:25 AM)M_R7 Wrote:  WE NEED A POLL!!!

+1.

Your a mod, this thread hasn't actually had any mention of the boxing since page 10. why not sort it?

+1 use pre-season to postcode cutting the crap

(11-24-2013 06:41 AM)drsrhino Wrote:  Lol. Groves was boxing great. The whole fight revolved around wether froch can land a punch. He actually caught him in the 3rd I think and groves was hurt. Once froch landed it was over. Same would happen in the 2nd fight.

Indeed.

Anyone else wondering about what Froch said about waiting until after the 8th round to give the audience a fight?


RE: Froch v Groves - Genghis Von Battenberg - 11-24-2013 10:49 AM

(11-24-2013 10:42 AM)MOT Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:08 AM)mrphillyc of 606 fame! Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:05 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  Why ain't you ban him? You have this power, Philo.

Come on really... Would be like clubbing a baby seal. Let the dunce have his fun.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So why were posts deleted, our did SUID actually open up emotionally and then talk to himself?

Hope it's all good SUID, let it out.

Eh? Huh


RE: Froch v Groves - Cheese - 11-24-2013 11:17 AM

thats the froch of yrs ago....far from worlds best.

groves is young and at the start of his career, a few yrs experience and he will win fights like that. he comes out of that fight with greater respect than froch for sure.


RE: Froch v Groves - M_R7 - 11-24-2013 11:51 AM

+1, Cheeso.


RE: Froch v Groves - Genghis Von Battenberg - 11-24-2013 12:06 PM

(11-24-2013 10:44 AM)MOT Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:26 AM)sinkers89 Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:25 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:22 AM)mrphillyc of 606 fame! Wrote:  
(11-24-2013 01:05 AM)Genghis Von Battenberg Wrote:  Why ain't you ban him? You have this power, Philo.

I do indeed. I like to watch people make a complete proper tom tit fool of themselves for all to see before wielding the axe. Desperate substance from a desperate man if truth be told in his instance...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You're saying that the threat of your banning him made him call you a "blathering pole-fancy", or words to that effect?

(11-24-2013 01:25 AM)M_R7 Wrote:  WE NEED A POLL!!!

+1.

Your a mod, this thread hasn't actually had any mention of the boxing since page 10. why not sort it?

+1 use pre-season to postcode cutting the crap

"Postcode cutting the crap?" The hell you say?


RE: Froch v Groves - sinkers89 - 11-24-2013 12:11 PM

Just watching the interview from groves this morning and Froch now.......dunno if its worth anything but Groves looks like he had a hiding. two moody black eyes, froch has a bit of a blemish


RE: Froch v Groves - Genghis Von Battenberg - 11-24-2013 12:15 PM

(11-24-2013 12:11 PM)sinkers89 Wrote:  Just watching the interview from groves this morning and Froch now.......dunno if its worth anything but Groves looks like he had a hiding. two moody black eyes, froch has a bit of a blemish

I think we're underselling how much he was twatting Groves on the ropes. And when Froch twats you, you feel it. Whether that justifies the ref's decision or not, one thing is probably clear: Groves won the boxing match, Froch is the better fighter. It'll be interesting whether that goads him into a rematch. Groves seems to think it won't.


RE: Froch v Groves - whotobeA - 11-24-2013 12:15 PM

People will give groves respect from this fight but is a mile off the respect froch has earned during his career. The Kessler, bute, super 6 fights will take some catching whereas groves is now defined by this fight.