Resting players?
|
08-17-2012, 09:26 PM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Resting players?
I don't think London's win should be dismissed because Wire had rested players, London mere missing plenty of players too and they have nowhere near the same depth that Wire have!
Riley, Bridge, Atkins, Ratchford, Myler, Morley, Monaghan, Wood, Waterhouse, Cooper, Hill, Solomona; they all could be considered regulars! There's loads of strength in that side while Evans, Williams, McCarthy, Grix and Blythe would almost certainly have a place in any side below the top 6. The players Wire put out there should have been more than capable of winning but were absolutely awful. They certainly don't seem to play too well without Briers. |
|||
08-17-2012, 09:35 PM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Resting players?
(08-17-2012 09:26 PM)CherryPie Wrote: I don't think London's win should be dismissed because Wire had rested players, London mere missing plenty of players too and they have nowhere near the same depth that Wire have! Exactly, birthday girl. London beat what was put in front of them and playing like they did, who's to say they wouldn't have beaten a stronger Wire side. |
|||
08-18-2012, 09:11 AM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Resting players?
Nice gesture by Wire. maybe RFL should encourage more clubs to do it when playing London.
|
|||
08-18-2012, 09:29 AM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
Resting players?
We all know the RFL are all for helping the bottom feeders of the league bullshit.......
|
|||
08-18-2012, 10:23 AM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Resting players?
I bet Smithy feels a bit silly now...
|
|||
08-18-2012, 10:44 AM
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Resting players?
doubt it. they were thinking about next week.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)